Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 00:51

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Taylor Swift Dance Wedding Video with Travis Kelce Reveals Unmatched Vibe - Athlon Sports
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry take kids to Disneyland and the family photos are magical - HOLA
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Dementia: Switching to MIND diet even later in life can lower risk - Medical News Today
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How did you know you weren't the narc?
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What are some funny stories of people calling 911 for non-emergencies?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why has Biden pulled ahead in battleground states and is now projected to win the 2024 presidency?